Pages: 1 [2]
|
|
|
|
Author
|
Topic: immer für alle Targets bauen oder nur für die bei denen sich was geändert hat? (Read 2366 times)
|
|
F4HTX
schon länger dabei
Offline
Posts: 66
Scotty, energize...
|
|
Re:immer für alle Targets bauen oder nur für die bei denen sich was geändert
« Reply #15 on: 29. November 2018, 07:24:39 »
|
|
Dear Friends,
After careful reading of the arguments detailed here, it appears to me that there might have a path combining almost both approaches.
Yes, it’s a lot more simpler for the user to see only one version advertised for all platforms, and I would love that.
But we might have to consider that the UHSDR will for sure fork drastically in the future. Because of the policy to support all platforms including very old ones, we will face hardware incompatibility regarding the software (new) features, and we will need to freeze the software for old timers at some point.
The idea might be to keep same version numbering as far as it does the same things, and fork when there is major differences.
For example, I think (correct me if I’m wrong) that the mchf doesn’t run the same noise filtering parameters than the F/H7. In that case a fork seems legitimate.
When it comes to the bootloader 5.01 or 5.02, this is within the same area of features, so I would keep the same numbering.
Not sure that my writing is as clear as my thinking on that…
Best Regards,
François
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
peter_77
Urgestein
Offline
Posts: 735
THE mcHF and UHSDR forum !
|
|
Re:immer für alle Targets bauen oder nur für die bei denen sich was geändert
« Reply #17 on: 29. November 2018, 10:11:55 »
|
|
To my opinion the actual situation fits perfectly well:
- Bootloader version the same for all HW
- Firmware version the same
- "Lite" version for the older HW with limited CPUs
So far its the right procedure and very easy to handle without any confusion. My 0.02$....
|
« Last Edit: 29. November 2018, 10:24:06 by peter_77 » |
Logged
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|